tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22350717.post114012782887626836..comments2012-10-31T12:49:31.695-07:00Comments on Urban Planning Research: The Meaning and Measure of Sprawlrandall cranehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06189926439915839716noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22350717.post-1141419433937274372006-03-03T12:57:00.000-08:002006-03-03T12:57:00.000-08:00Rolf:my tacit comment was that the conclusions in ...Rolf:<BR/><BR/>my tacit comment was that the conclusions in Randall's post weren't quite correct. <BR/><BR/>Thank you for doing this work and making these concerns explicit - I should have brought those out with a little more detail. <BR/><BR/>BTW - John Carruthers is an old prof of mine. I'll pass along the compliment. :o)<BR/><BR/>Regards,<BR/><BR/>Dan StaleyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22350717.post-1141409796998452332006-03-03T10:16:00.000-08:002006-03-03T10:16:00.000-08:00Randy -- This article uses data sources that aren'...Randy -- <BR/><BR/>This article uses data sources that aren't longitudinally compatible. I asked a colleague -- Greg Taff, remote sensing and GIS maven at the UNC Chapel Hill Geography Department -- to comment on the sources. Here's what he had to say:<BR/><BR/>"The 2 datasets that the 'Causes of sprawl' article uses are not very compatible for the purpose of locating new exurban areas. The 1976 Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22350717.post-1141070642575647552006-02-27T12:04:00.000-08:002006-02-27T12:04:00.000-08:00Randall,Marina Alberti at UW does landcover change...Randall,<BR/><BR/>Marina Alberti at UW does landcover change modeling, some of it for NSF, but for Puget Sound region. Check out some of her work. Her older work is with the 30m LandSat pixel resolution, but she also has higher res. for other work as well. She has encountered the same issue wrt developed/grass pixel analysis & seems to have started to overcome it & has developed indicators of Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com